Money & society · 2019
Can expectations about male and female roles shape how people rate a self-driving car’s voice assistant?
Yes, in an online experiment with 158 participants, assistants whose gender and role matched conventional expectations were perceived as easier to use and more useful. Informative male assistants and social female assistants received higher ratings than social male assistants and informative female assistants. This finding concerns perceptions, not demonstrated improvements in actual driving.
Details
The researchers explored how a self-driving car’s voice assistant might influence acceptance of the vehicle. They compared assistants that provided information with assistants that took a social role, with male and female versions of each.
The study treated informative male assistants and social female assistants as matching conventional expectations about which roles suit males and females. These combinations were perceived as easier to use and more useful than the opposite pairings. This result reflects responses to the assistant’s design, not evidence that either gender is inherently better suited to a particular role.
Although the research aimed to examine intentions to adopt self-driving cars, the abstract does not report a direct finding about adoption intentions or actual use. It also does not give the size of the rating differences or describe participants’ backgrounds.
What do you think?
Good conversations begin with curiosity.
You can read comments without an account. Sign in to write.
Loading comments…