Could testing memory after four weeks better reflect the memory problems people notice in daily life?

Details

Despite their excellent clinical validity, objective memory measures often do not reflect self-perceived memory impairment. This mismatch has mostly been attributed to depressed mood. Another possible explanation is that standard retention intervals of 20–60 minutes are too short to reflect memory functioning in everyday life, limiting their ecological validity. The researchers therefore explored the value of longer retention intervals for understanding subjective memory deficits.

This prospective study involved 73 patients with epilepsy. In addition to the standard 30-minute retention interval of the verbal learning and memory test (VLMT), patients were randomized to free delayed recall after either 1 week or 4 weeks. Mood was assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI).

Self-perceived memory deficits were reported by 44 patients (60%), whereas objective verbal memory impairment was present in 26 patients (36%). Subjective and objective memory performance agreed in 53% of patients. Multivariate analyses identified memory performance after 4 weeks and self-rated mood as determinants of subjective memory impairment. Self-perceived memory impairment correlated with the number of words remembered after 4 weeks (r = -0.361, p = 0.030) and the BDI total score (r = 0.332, p = 0.004), but not with recall performance after 30 minutes or 1 week.

The researchers concluded that subjective memory appears to follow a different time scale from routine memory testing. Introducing longer retention intervals may therefore improve the ecological validity of standard memory tests. The findings also underscore that mood must be controlled for when addressing subjective memory complaints.