Health & body · 2020
Can targeting a liver tumor’s feeding arteries before heat ablation help control the tumor?
In a prospective, single-arm study of 25 patients with hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma, feeding artery ablation before reduced tumor , with cumulative local tumor progression of 4.2% at 3 years. These outcomes describe the combined treatment, not a comparison with radiofrequency ablation alone.
Details
The study aimed to establish a modified feeding artery ablation (FAA) strategy as an add-on to percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to evaluate its outcomes. In this prospective, single-arm study, 25 patients with hypervascular HCC measuring 2–5 cm in diameter were treated from June 2014 to August 2016. They underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-guided FAA before conventional RFA.
CEUS was used to evaluate the technical success of FAA and subsequent changes in tumor perfusion. CT/MRI was used at 1 month to assess technical efficacy and ablation sizes. Therapeutic outcomes—local tumor progression (LTP), overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS)—were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method. One or two target feeding arteries were visible on CEUS in 52.6% (61/116) of hypervascular HCCs measuring 2–5 cm in diameter.
The technical success rate of FAA was 100%. Of the 25 target tumors, 13/25 (52.0%) were classified as having a complete perfusion response, while 12/25 (48.0%) had a partial perfusion response. At the 1-month evaluation, the ablation volume was 41.9 ± 17.5 cm³ (range, 14.9–78.2 cm³), and the ablative safety margin was 8.2 ± 1.9 mm (range, 4–12 mm). Neither ablation volume nor safety margin differed significantly between the complete and partial perfusion-response subgroups.
Cumulative LTP rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 0.0%, 4.2%, and 4.2%, respectively. Three-year OS was 70.3%, and three-year RFS was 59.8%. There were no treatment-related deaths. Major complications occurred in one patient (4.0%).
The researchers concluded that tailored CEUS-guided FAA, used as an add-on to conventional percutaneous RFA, can reduce tumor perfusion and provide good local control of HCC.
What do you think?
Good conversations begin with curiosity.
You can read comments without an account. Sign in to write.
Loading comments…