Health & body · 2016
Can training help older adults understand speech in noisy surroundings?
In this crossover study of 24 older adults, adaptive working-memory training improved scores on the trained tasks, but no training-related improvement in understanding speech in noise was observed. The gains also did not transfer to other working-memory tasks or other cognitive domains.
Details
Understanding speech against background sound can be challenging for older adults. Speech comprehension in noise appears to depend on working memory and executive-control processes, raising the possibility that training these abilities could have rehabilitative potential for age-related hearing loss.
Researchers examined adaptive working-memory training using Cogmed in 24 older adults. A cognitive test battery, including the Reading Span test, which is sensitive to working memory, assessed whether gains generalized to other working-memory tasks (near-transfer) or other cognitive domains (far-transfer). They also assessed far-transfer to speech-in-noise performance, including a closed-set sentence task. To examine whether cognitive training affected the benefit obtained from meaning-based context, they also tested transfer to open-set sentences: half were semantically coherent (high-context), and half were semantically anomalous (low-context).
In a crossover design over 10 weeks, participants completed both adaptive working-memory training and placebo training, with 25 sessions of each, lasting 0.5–1 hour per session at 5 sessions per week. Scores on the adaptive working-memory training tasks improved as a result of training. However, the gains did not transfer to other working-memory tasks or tasks involving other cognitive domains. No training-related improvement in speech-in-noise performance was observed.
Working-memory measures correlated with the intelligibility of low-context sentences, but not high-context sentences, suggesting that sentence context may reduce the load on working memory. The Reading Span test significantly correlated only with a test of visual episodic memory, suggesting that it is not a pure test of working memory, as is commonly assumed.
What do you think?
Good conversations begin with curiosity.
You can read comments without an account. Sign in to write.
Loading comments…