Health & body · 2026
Can simpler blood tests identify high-risk pregnancies even when they miss many cases of gestational diabetes?
Yes. The fasting glucose and criteria had only 25% , but identified groups with higher BMI and higher rates of large-for-gestational-age infants, including among those negative on the usual diagnostic ; they were not valid enough to replace the OGTT.
Details
Fasting glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were used to diagnose gestational diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study asked whether those diagnostic criteria might also have a role outside the pandemic.
This was a comparative diagnostic study with simultaneous testing, comparisons between groups, and regression analysis. From May 2022 to July 2024, 354 females with an abnormal 50-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) underwent both the usual diagnostic test, the 100-g OGTT, and assessment using alternative diagnostic criteria (A): fasting glucose ≥ 95 mg/dL and/or HbA1c ≥ 5.7%. There were four groups: OGTT+/A+ (positive on both, n = 20), OGTT+/A− (positive only on the usual diagnostic test, n = 60), OGTT−/A+ (positive only on the alternative criteria, n = 24), and OGTT−/A− (negative on both, n = 250). The groups were compared for clinical characteristics and obstetric and perinatal outcomes.
The alternative criteria had a sensitivity of 25% and a specificity of 91.2%. Body mass index (BMI) was similar in the OGTT−/A+ and OGTT+/A+ groups: 30.1 ± 6.3 kg/m² and 32.7 ± 5.3 kg/m², respectively. BMI in these groups was significantly higher than in the OGTT+/A− and OGTT−/A− groups, which had values of 26.8 ± 5.1 kg/m² and 25.6 ± 5.0 kg/m², respectively.
Rates of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants followed a similar between-group pattern: OGTT+/A+, 38.9%; OGTT+/A−, 11.8%; OGTT−/A+, 29.4%; and OGTT−/A−, 12.4% (P = 0.028). In regression analysis, a history of macrosomia was independently associated with higher odds of LGA (odds ratio [OR] = 7.948, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.269–27.842; P = 0.001), as was higher pregestational BMI (OR = 1.069, 95% CI: 1.002–1.140; P = 0.042).
The researchers concluded that the alternative criteria were not valid enough to replace the OGTT. However, they identified a group of patients with a higher risk profile and adverse perinatal outcomes who might benefit from health interventions.
What do you think?
Good conversations begin with curiosity.
You can read comments without an account. Sign in to write.
Loading comments…